O'Hara zoning change could mean riverfront improvement
O'Hara Council last week tweaked the township's zoning ordinance to allow for more improvements to property along the Allegheny River.
Members approved a riverfront Green Overlay District that will accommodate projects such as trail development.
In an overlay district, a local government can impose extra rules for specific sections of property.
In the riverfront area, “Our zoning is currently manufacturing,” Township Engineer Chuck Steinert said.
Iris Whitworth, executive director of Allegheny River Towns Enterprize Zone, or ARTEZ, a community development group, pushed for the move to protect shoreline plans that include a trail system from Millvale to the Allegheny Valley.
The overlay district requires developers to allow for a trail when new projects along the riverfront are planned, she said.
In 2011, ARTEZ proposed a trail connection along the river, and partnered with Lower Valley communities to research its feasibility, Whitworth said.
In Etna, there is a plan for a riverfront park, and in neighboring Sharpsburg a portion of Bridge Street will be reconstructed.
“Our group is focused on improvement of the riverfront in all seven of our communities,” she said. Member communities of ARTEZ are Sharpsburg, Blawnox, O'Hara, Aspinwall, Millvale, Etna and Shaler.
“We are working to ensure the river is a benefit and a resource,” she said.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.