Aspinwall seeks help collecting ticket fees
Street sweeping has started in Aspinwall bringing about tickets along Virginia Avenue.
Photo by Jan Pakler | for The Herald
Aspinwall could look to outside help to collect fees from unpaid parking tickets.
Officials are considering allowing Penn Credit to help collect unpaid parking tickets that have accumulated from repeat offenders. Borough manager Melissa Lang said using the company would not cost the borough any money and a 25 percent fee would be added to the tickets the firm collects.
“We would turn in our tickets to them, they would then go after our repeat offenders to collect our fees that they owe us,” Lang said.
Lang said she was unsure how much the borough could collect through Penn Credit but the borough is owed about $2,000 in delinquent ticket fees.
The borough sends a letter to people with delinquent tickets after 30 days to notify them of an increased fine and that additional fines will be added if it goes to the magistrate's office.
Lang said they would add a line to that letter notifying them that fines also could come from Penn Credit if the ticket isn't paid.
“Some of the people that have up to 30 tickets really don't care so they haven't paid them,” Lang said. “What we need now is a way to go after those people.”
Mayor Joe Giuffre said most residents don't have a problem with the parking regulations, meaning that raising the fine wouldn't be a fair way to convince people to follow the rules.
“I wouldn't want to raise the fine on everybody who makes a mistake once,” Giuffre said.
Councilman Joseph Warren said he would be in favor of using the company.
“It makes good sense, especially if there's no cost to it,” Warren said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.