Proposed bed and breakfast in Aspinwall gains traction
Bed and breakfasts are a step closer to reality in Aspinwall.
Council voted 4-3 to advertise an update to its conditional uses in the borough's zoning district that stretches from Western to Brilliant avenues, known as AR-3. Council members Kevin Gordon, Mark Ellermeyer, Joseph Warren and Ann Pawlikowski voted in favor while council members Joe Noro, Ann Marsico and Jim Donahoe opposed.
The borough's planning commission and Allegheny County's economic development department must review the changes before council takes a final vote. Solicitor Steve Korbel said council could take a final vote by June.
Karen Connor has expressed interest in buying 111 Brilliant Ave. and turning it into a bed and breakfast. Some residents who live near the property have spoken out against her proposal, citing already tight parking in the area and concerns about safety in the neighborhood.
The requirements for a bed and breakfast state that any building used for one must be at least 5,000 square feet. Breakfast also would be the only food allowed to be prepared and or served at the site and only for overnight guests.
If Connor follows through on her plan to be the main resident of the site, have three rooms for rent as the bed and breakfast and one apartment rental, she would be required to have six off-street parking spaces under the proposal. The site does not have enough room for that many spaces as currently designed.
Korbel said issues with parking and occupancy requirements for Connor's specific plan would be addressed as she moves forward with her proposal.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.