Sharpsburg considers replacing brick sidewalks with cement
Long-and short-term fixes for deteriorating sidewalks along part of Main Street in Sharpsburg are in the works.
Officials voted to have Borough Engineer Robert Zischkau prepare a bid package to replace the bricks along the river side of Main Street with cement.
While that project gets underway, property owners also have asked for replacement bricks to improve safety and prevent any issues with liability.
The crumbling bricks, which were paid for with money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency after flooding in the borough, were installed about nine years ago.
The company that provided the bricks, R.I. Lampus of Springdale, has agreed to provide new bricks for free but will not pay for installation.
The property owners are required to pay for costs related to maintaining sidewalks.
Officials met with property owners to discuss the project during a town hall meeting last week. The property owners indicated they would prefer cement sidewalks.
Joel Weiss, who owns several properties in the area, said that bricks are not practical.
“If you want the community to really look good, then cement is the proper thing to do,” Weiss said.
Councilman Matthew Rudzki said it is important for the sidewalks to be consistent no matter what the property owners decide.
“We need to get everyone on the same page so Main Street maintains its uniformity,” Rudzki said.
Borough officials will prepare a set of specifications along with representatives from the property owners that will be used for the project.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said property owners can submit the number of replacement bricks they would like to have, and she will contact the borough engineer to get a temporary solution started.
“We can at least get that started with the replacement bricks,” Barbus said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.