Meeting scheduled to answer questions about O'Hara sewer project
O'Hara residents affected by the impending $3.3 million Saxonburg Boulevard sewer project can attend a meeting to address questions.
Council will hold a special session at 7 p.m. on April 29 at the Moose Lodge on Saxonburg Boulevard.
“There have been a lot of questions about liability issues,” Township Manager Julie Jakubec said.
The project is meant to provide reliable sewer service to area residents who still rely on septic systems. Work will eliminate three deteriorating pump stations and replace them with one new one.
It is unclear how much of the cost will fall to property owners. Construction is expected to take up to two years.
Township Engineer Chuck Steinert said about 40 residents have signed easement agreements, and another 18 or so are in discussions with township staff.
“The problem is the 25 where we have not gotten any response at all,” Jakubec said.
“We would like to create an open dialogue and get those people in talks before we have to go another direction.”
The majority of questions have focused on liability issues, and Jakubec said the answer is simple. The same rules apply, as they do for the remainder of the property, she said.
“The township assumes responsibility for the underground, and the surface remains with the property owner,” she said.
Council will apply for a $500,000 grant from the Allegheny County Redevelopment Authority's Gaming and Economic Development Fund to help pay for costs.
The township already was awarded $250,000 from the county's Community Infrastructure and Tourism Fund.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.