O'Hara officials consider adding walking trail at Woodland Park
A walking trail may be added at Woodland Park in O'Hara Township.
Township park and recreation committee members recently met at the park on Villa Drive, off Dorseyville Road, to discuss potential improvements to the property.
“We talked about a walking path or a community garden,” township Manager Julie Jakubec said.
Ideas are preliminary, she said, but the nature of the park lends itself to these more “passive recreation projects.”
Parks and recreation commission members toured the property, where the upper field abuts a neighboring farm.
“There literally is a path where the cows used to walk,” Jakubec said.
That area would lend itself to a walking area, she said.
Money is not slated in this year's budget for work. A start to the project this year might include planting trees along the perimeter to delineate the park from the farm, she said.
Council spent $21,000 two years ago to install new playground equipment at Woodland Park.
The township replaced an old wooden unit with a new climber and slides. The township paid for a new layer of wood chips in the play area at that time too.
Work was part of a comprehensive plan to upgrade each of the municipal parks. Over the course of two years, council spent more than $100,000 to resurface the tennis courts at Meadow Park, pave the parking lots at Squaw Valley and install new lighting at Sacco Park.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.