Indiana Township considers selling 2 acres behind Dorseyville fire hall
Indiana Township supervisors are debating selling 2 acres on Charles Street.
The land, contiguous to the ball field behind the Dorseyville fire hall, has a gravel lot and a tennis court in extremely poor condition, according to township manager Daniel Anderson.
It has been proposed that the minimum bid be $75,000 for the property and that subdividing it be prohibited. A decision to seek bids could be made at the supervisors' regularly scheduled meeting on May 13.
Township officials have considered selling the property since the town hall opened about five years ago. The Saxonburg Boulevard building has indoor recreation facilities, including a gym, along with restrooms. There is a combination tennis and basketball court outside.
The town hall is about a block away from Charles Street.
While the Charles Street park and town hall are close, they are on opposite sides of Saxonburg Road. Some residents have questioned the wisdom of selling the Charles Street property because crossing the busy road could be dangerous for youngsters who want to play in a park.
If the sale is approved, the money raised will go into the general fund.
Anderson said the township's parks and recreation programs typically are funded by developers' fees. Because there aren't many developments going on within the township at the present time, the general fund is supporting some parks projects.
The local matching money for the pavilion accessible to people with disabilities in Rural Ridge and town hall work have come from the general fund.
Sharon Drake is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.