Sharpsburg agrees to match up to $4,500 for library expansion project
The expansion of the Sharpsburg Community Library is set to begin this month, and the project could get some last-minute help from the borough.
Sharpsburg officials have agreed the borough will match any donations up to $4,500 for the project.
The library had been looking at a $75,000 shortfall for the project in May, with more than $834,000 raised.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said negotiations with Franjo Construction, which will complete the work, helped reduce the shortfall. It now stands at $9,000, she said. Library officials had asked if the borough could help financially. They offered to reimburse its contribution as more donations came in.
“If money does come in, then council would not be held responsible for that,” Barbus said.
Councilman Matthew Rudzki said helping the library is a worthwhile cause, but finding all the money needed could be tough.
“I think it's a good idea. I'm not sure necessarily that the money is there,” Rudzki said.
He suggested that instead of providing $9,000 to the library, the borough instead should provide half as a match for donations that come in. The borough still would be reimbursed for its contribution. Other council members agreed.
“They get $4,500 in donations, they get the other $4,500 from us,” Rudzki said.
Donations can be made at the borough building at 1611 Main St. in Sharpsburg.
The library expansion will include more space for materials and the children's area, along with community meeting rooms.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.