Effort continues to crack down on blight in Sharpsburg
Sharpsburg officials will continue to do their best in an effort to track down owners of abandoned properties, and the borough might try to buy one such structure.
Council President Karen Pastor said the borough has been getting complaints from neighbors of abandoned properties asking if the borough can perform some maintenance on the structures.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said there are no regulations requiring the borough to perform maintenance.
“There is no written directive within the state, the federal government or Allegheny County that states the borough of Sharpsburg has to take care of the properties,” Barbus said.
While owners of some properties are difficult to find, the borough can continue to fine owners who refuse to clean up their properties.
“If you have somebody who is an owner, you can fine them, take them to the magistrate under the property management code,” borough solicitor Mike Witherel said.
Barbus said another option is that the borough could develop an ordinance that would charge property owners a fee if the borough was forced to clean up their properties.
A property on 13th Street could be taken care of by the borough.
Officials will consider buying a building near 13th and Middle streets. Officials said the building has become a problem for the town and neighbors.
“It's definitely a health hazard,” Councilman Greg Domian said.
If a deal can be worked out with the current owner, the building could be demolished and a parking lot built on the site.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.