Blind intersection a concern in Aspinwall
Aspinwall officials will look at how to address reports of traffic problems along Center Avenue, near Ninth Street.
Tina Mourra, a resident of nearby Virginia Avenue Ext., last week told council that she nearly had a car accident near the intersection.
She said that traffic has become worse on the road, as motorists, who might not be familiar with the street, are using it to pass through the borough.
“They are not always aware that there is a blind intersection with Ninth Street and Center,” Mourra said.
A mirror near the intersection to help drivers mostly is ineffective, Mourra said.
Officials said they will investigate what signs they could place on the road, such additional speed-limit signs, which wouldn't need approval from PennDOT.
Mayor Joe Giuffre said reversing the direction of Ninth Street, which is one way, to not lead traffic onto Center Avenue could be an option if residents supported the idea.
“If we changed Ninth Street the opposite direction, at least that would help with the traffic,” Giuffre said.
Council President Joe Noro said officials would look at ways to help with traffic problems, but the one option that might help might not be possible.
“You probably need to stop the traffic at the top of that hill,” Noro said.
Mourra said something needs to be done about the traffic before an accident happens near the intersection.
“I think it's come to the point now there's increasing traffic, and the problem's really only going to get worse to the point where something pretty bad is going to happen,” Mourra said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.