Assessment appeals cost Sharpsburg money
Sharpsburg officials will start their budget process in October but Councilman Matthew Rudzki warned that the borough could have a challenge.
The borough's tax base has dropped to $115.2 million, from $120.5 million last year.
That has meant about $35,000 lost in tax revenue.
The drop is due to successful appeals following Allegheny County property reassessments, Rudzki said.
The borough refunded about $30,000 in real estate taxes after appeals.
“That might not seem like a lot of money but for a small borough like Sharpsburg, it is a ton of money,” Rudzki said.
The current tax rate is 6.47 mills with an additional 0.15 mills for the Sharpsburg Volunteer Fire Department.
Rudzki said if budget numbers stay the same, that rate could increase to 6.85 mills along with 0.15 mills for the fire department.
Rudzki noted that borough officials won't begin finalizing the budget for 2015 until October, meaning that the situation could change.
“I'm not saying we're raising taxes,” Rudzki said. “I'm saying where we are now and how it affects the borough.”
Rudzki said with the numbers he presented, homeowners would pay an additional $19.11 in taxes per year for a property with the average assessed value of $50,300.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.