Sharpsburg library makes funding goal
A last call for donations has closed the fundraising gap for the Sharpsburg Community Library.
Borough officials announced earlier this month that $9,000 was needed to fund the expansion project for the facility, a branch of Cooper-Siegel Library in Fox Chapel.
Sharpsburg agreed to match donations up to $4,500, with its half being reimbursed by the library as more money came in.
Less than a month later, the library reached its goal.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said 10 donors stepped forward to donate bringing the total contribution, including the match, to $11,560.
“We needed $9,000 but we got a little bit more so thank you all,” Barbus said.
Jill McConnell, interim director of the Cooper-Siegel Library, said she was thrilled with how residents and groups stepped up.
“The response from the public was just really, really phenomenal,” McConnell said.
The library has raised more than $835,000 for the project, she said.
Franjo Construction will complete the expansion, and McConnell said a contract could be finalized by the end of the week.
“Once that's signed, we will start to build,” McConnell said.
Work should begin by the end of this month or early August, McConnell said.
The project will include meeting rooms and increased space for the library's materials. The library will remain in its current location on Main Street. Plans for the expansion were unveiled in 2012.
Barbus said thank you letters will be sent to the donors.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.