Linden Gym upgrades in Sharpsburg's sight
Sharpsburg officials hope to make some improvements to Linden Gymnasium.
The site, which is owned by Sharpsburg, hosts the borough's weekly basketball clinic and other community events.
Councilman Greg Domian, who runs the clinics, said while the floor of the gym is in good shape, other parts need work — including the water fountains, scoreboard and ventilation system.
“I see that gym deteriorating and I know a lot of money was put into it,” Domian said.
He said the ceiling fans don't work and there is no water to drink.
He said fixing a water fountain that likely hasn't been updated in years is the top priority. He said he is looking into costs for those repairs.
“I swear that's the same water fountain I drank out of when I went to Sharpsburg Elementary School,” he said.
Councilman Anthony Sacco said officials should map out what work is needed. They then can see if funding is available.
“It'd be a good idea to get a list of stuff that needs to be replaced immediately,” Sacco said.
Domian also said there are holes in the scoreboard, making it unusable. He said he wants children from the clinic to play against other local clubs, meaning they will need a scoreboard.
“There's a lot of damage that's been done down there,” Domian said.
Domian said he wants to keep using the gym because of the success of the clinic and hopes to see it improved.
“I don't want to lose the momentum,” Domian said.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.