Love of flying leads Aspinwall pilot to position with Boeing
Before she had her driver's license, Brooke Gladstone was taking the controls and flying a plane.
Gladstone, 23, of Aspinwall has been a licensed pilot since she was 17. She's taking that love of aviation to Charleston, S.C., where she'll work for Boeing in its propulsion systems division. She previously interned with the company in Huntington Beach, Calif., and Seattle.
“I wanted to stay on the East Coast, and then they got me that job from there,” Gladstone said.
She graduated from Carnegie Mellon University in May with a master's degree in materials science and engineering, and a year earlier with a bachelor's degree in materials science and engineering and biomedical engineering.
Gladstone said she began flying at an early age with her father.
“Ever since I was little, I'd go up with him and he'd let me take the controls,” Gladstone said.
Like her father, Gladstone views flying as a hobby. Her first solo flight came when she was 16.
“It's really quiet because no one's there to talk to,” Gladstone said.
Getting her license meant being allowed to take passengers when she flies.
With a move to Charleston this summer, Gladstone said she is excited to explore her new city. She's also eager to get to work for the company.
“I'm excited to stay there longer than just an internship, so I can follow through on projects instead of leaving after my couple months are over,” Gladstone said.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.