If Blawnox continues to receive funding through the federal Community Development Block Grant program, it will have to be for smaller projects.
Borough Engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering said the borough no longer qualifies for grant money for community-wide projects under the program.
“Apparently, you're an affluent community,” Taylor said. “It's based on census tract.”
The change means that projects that use CDBG money would have to be “area wide,” and impact no more than 150 homes in the borough.
“Anything that benefits the entire community, you're not eligible for anymore,” Taylor said.
Funding for those types of projects would be limited to $20,000 per year through the borough's participation in the Allegheny Valley North Council of Governments, Taylor said.
The borough could complete a neighborhood survey that looks at income in the area, to receive money for projects. “Replacement of sewer lines, replacement of water lines” has to be done in a segmented way, Taylor said.
Completion of larger projects likely will be difficult. “If you want to do something large, the money probably won't be there,” Taylor said.
In the past, the borough has used grant money for a water tank painting project and various other work. “It's good you're getting the tank painted, and you have some of your other infrastructure taken care of,” Taylor said.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.