Fundraising needed for new Sharpsburg VFD fire truck
The Sharpsburg Volunteer Fire Department will have to depend on fundraising to get its new fire truck.
Councilman Lou Costanzo, who also serves as the fire chief, told officials last month that the department was rejected for a federal grant that would have helped get a new fire truck.
“That really, really hurts us,” Costanzo said.
Council President Karen Pastor, also is a member of the department, said several reasons were given for the denial. They included the size of the borough, Sharpsburg's mutual aid agreements with other communities, and that it already has an apparatus that can pump water.
Costanzo said several other local departments were also denied funding. Pastor said it is difficult for departments to get funding for trucks.
“You really have to be hard-pressed for an apparatus to get one,” Pastor said.
The department is trying to replace a truck that is about 30 years old. The borough instituted a .15-mill tax increase last year to generate funding for the department. The tax increase generates about $17,000 per year. The truck could cost about $430,000.
Fundraising efforts have included the Sharpsburg Fort Pitt Barbecue last month at James Sharp Landing. The department also received a donation from the Guyasuta Days Festival Committee.
Pastor said the department will need to continue to rely on help from the community to purchase the new truck.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.