Aspinwall National Night Out event draws crowd
After another successful National Night Out, the Aspinwall Neighborhood Watch has its sights set on the next wave of improvements to a local playground.
The group has been raising money to improve the playground near Fifth Street and Field Avenue for the last several years through events such as National Night Out.
This year's event raised nearly $5,000 and brought about 500 people to the Ben Killian Ball Fields, Lorraine Marks, president of the neighborhood watch, said.
“We were very happy with that,” Marks said.
Marks cited LifeFlight and Musico's K-9 Academy as two new additions to this year's event that were a hit with visitors.
The group completed phase one of improvements to the park earlier this year. That work included equipment for younger children.
The next round of work will include the replacement of a play structure that includes slides and a tower for children between the ages of 5 and 12.
“That structure is rusty and in need of replacement just from the age of it,” Marks said. “It doesn't look great and we want to replace it with something new and exciting.”
The group is hoping donors will step up to help with those costs.
Marks said it could cost about $80,000 for the structure. The group has about $20,000 so far for that project.
The group also is waiting for a grant the borough is seeking for a ramp for people with disabilities. Once funding for that comes through, the group can begin work in the second part of the playground.
“That ramp will lead the way to the higher play area, which is where we took a lot of the pieces out and recycled them in the lower space,” Marks said.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.