Painter seeking Sharpsburg wall for mural project
Pam Bruno wants to revitalize efforts to bring a mural to Sharpsburg.
Bruno, an experienced mural painter, said she had planned to paint a mural in the borough several years ago through a grant program but the idea never came to fruition.
The lack of a usable wall stalled the project.
Bruno said she has an offer for donated materials and will donate her labor.
She had a design in mind, and a program with local students to help with the project also is a possibility.
Still, a location would need to be found before any work could begin.
“Somebody in the borough would have to be willing to allow us to use one of their walls,” Bruno said.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said previous attempts to find a property to use have been unsuccessful. Bruno said she also has made some inquiries on her own but with no luck.
Council President Karen Pastor said she'd like to see the project completed.
“I've wanted a mural in Sharpsburg for a long time,” Pastor said.
When murals previously were done in the area, Bruno said, their town was one of the only ones left out.
“I'd like to see this done,” Bruno said. “We're really the only ones in this corridor that did not get at least one mural.”
Officials suggested that Bruno work with the newly founded Sharpsburg Neighborhood Organization to help in her efforts to find a suitable location.
“I really would like to do this if I can find a spot,” Bruno said.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.