Station Street repairs sought; records show road in Sharpsburg is private
A local business and church want improvements to a nearby street and alley but Sharpsburg officials might be limited in how much help they can give.
Representatives from Hornbeck Engineering and Mt. Olive Baptist Church told officials last week that Station Street and a nearby alley are in need of repair.
Richard Petrie, president of Hornbeck Engineering, said while he understood that the funding might not exist to pave Station Street, it could be converted back to a brick road.
“It might be better if all the old pieces of asphalt were simply removed from the brick,” Petrie said.
A nearby alley off of the road also needs work and is dangerous for people to walk down, Tammi Oliver, controller at the engineering firm said. The area also is used by other nearby businesses.
However, records indicate that part of the area in question is a private street.
Borough engineer Robert Zischkau said he couldn't recommend the borough do work on a private street. However, he said when paving companies come to the borough next month, they could provide information on improving the street.
“I'm sure they'd be willing to give these people a quote if they wanted it,” Zischkau said.
He said he is not sure if the alley is public.
Council President Karen Pastor said she'd like to see quotes for improvements to the alley when the area is addressed.
Zischkau said he would pass contact information for those involved to the paving companies so they can discuss the issue.
Tom McGee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.