Hempfield woman faces hearing in assault
A Hempfield woman was arraigned Wednesday on charges that she punched and kicked a Greensburg police officer in Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital.
Angela Adele Zontek, 22, of 375 Fosterville Road faces a preliminary hearing Oct. 18 before Greensburg District Judge James Albert on three counts each of aggravated assault and recklessly endangering another person; two counts of driving under the influence; and one count each of hit-and-run and reckless driving.
Police charged her with the three aggravated assault counts for two punches that she allegedly threw at the face of Patrolman John Carnes and a kick to his lower stomach Wednesday morning in the hospital, according to court papers.
Police filed the three reckless-endangerment offenses on behalf of driver Phyllis McGrew and passengers Thomas Ross and Crystal Fole. Zontek nearly struck their car a few times about 11:40 p.m. Tuesday on Harvey Avenue before eventually hitting them and causing slight bumper damage, police said.
McGrew, fearing for her safety, said she pulled to the side of the road to try avoiding Zontek, but Zontek's 2008 Pontiac Vibe struck her Nissan Versa. Zontek drove off and eventually was stopped by police, authorities said.
In the Greensburg hospital, Zontek began yelling obscenities at the admission desk, police said. She asked about her purse, which police said they told her they had secured in a patrol car and would return to her later. Zontek then resisted going to an examination room, police said. In the examination room, she assaulted Carnes, authorities said.
Hospital personnel drew blood from Zontek.
She was jailed in lieu of posting $5,000 bond.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer f or Trib Total M edia. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 o r firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.