Hempfield grad recognized for service to Red Cross
The contributions of a 2013 graduate of Hempfield Area High School graduate were recognized during the annual meeting of the 100-county American Red Cross Blood Services, Greater Alleghenies Region.
Tom Lawson, who was unable to attend the meeting, received the Youth Volunteer Award during an awards assembly this month at the high school.
“Recipients of these awards were selected by a group of Red Cross volunteers and staff members, and represent the highest quality of service to the Red Cross and hospital patients,” said Bob Lawn, chair of the region's volunteer board of directors.
Lawson, a three-year member of student council who served as president this past school year, has been among the most active blood drive coordinators in Westmoreland County, the Red Cross said.
The school generally has more than 200 donor sign-ups for its fall and spring blood drives and collects an average of 125 or more units per drive. The school's blood drive this past March was its best ever, with 158 donations.
Lawson coordinated and scheduled all of the sign-ups, personally called businesses to solicit donations and often wrote all of the thank-you cards. He held orientation meetings with student council members. In addition, he scheduled workers on blood drive day and followed up on their success throughout the day.
“Overall, he takes a very personal approach and attitude toward the overall success of the drive, and takes it very personally if things do not go as planned,” his faculty adviser wrote. “This is probably his best overall quality, not because others will judge him, but rather because this is what he expects of himself.”
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.