New Greensburg Salem volunteers will require clearance
People who would like to volunteer for Greensburg Salem School District activities will need to complete an online background check and pay for it.
The school board has approved a process where potential volunteers would be checked through the National Center for Safety Initiatives at a cost of $26.25.
“It would be anyone interacting with children,” Ashley Nestor, coordinator of elementary education, said.
Those volunteers with currently approved governmental clearances are exempt.
She told the school board last month that she examined other reporting systems and they would have cost volunteers twice as much or even more.
District officials are ironing out some final details before sending out a letter about the background checks to parents.
The letter will include a question-and-answer section, Nestor said.
Applying for a clearance should take only a few minutes, officials said.
Potential volunteers would go directly to the safety initiatives' website: www.ncisafe.com.
They would then enter basic geographic information.
They can pay for the check immediately by credit card.
District officials are working out provisions for anyone who would like to pay by cash, Nestor said.
After the information is submitted, the turnaround time for confirmation generally takes 10 business days, officials said.
The district is notified about who submits information.
The district further can monitor the checks both at the building and district levels.
District officials are deciding how often volunteers will need to do the checks.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.