Greensburg Salem sticks with Solicitor Scales
Greensburg Salem school board has again hired attorney John Scales, 81, the district's solicitor for about 35 years.
His agreement calls for him to get $1,100 per month and an hourly rate of $110 for work beyond normal duties, such as for tax appeals, officials said.
He was paid the same rate last year.
Scales' tenure as solicitor was interrupted at the start of this century when the board decided not to retain him. He returned about a year later when new members joined the board. Since then, he has continued to give the district legal advice.
In another matter, directors will continue to hold the board discussion meeting the first Wednesday of each month and the regular meeting the following Wednesday. Both sessions will begin at 7 p.m. at the middle school.
Directors approved exceptions to the schedule in May and June, when each meeting will be held a week later than normal. No meetings will be held in July.
In another matter, middle school students will present “Beauty and the Beast Jr.” as the 2013-14 musical production.
Students will perform the evenings of Friday, March 21, and Saturday, March 22. They will present an afternoon show on March 23.
In other matters, directors:
• Approved Athletic Director Lynn Jobe's attendance at the Pennsylvania Athletic Directors' Association Annual Conference in Hershey March 18-21 at a cost of $1,145 to the district.
• Hired Sue Glowa as senior high musical director for 2013-14 for $4,039 on a supplemental contract.
• Employed Melvin Orange to lead the high school musical orchestra for $1,787 and senior high play for $1,530, both supplemental contracts.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.