Beauty salon proposed for downtown Greensburg
More plans will need to be presented before a beauty salon can move into the former Red and White grocery store in Greensburg.
Members of the city's Historic and Architectural Review board told the building's owner, the Columbus Home Club Inc., they needed to see more detailed drawings of planned improvements for the exterior of the building at 643 N. Main St.
The board tabled a possible decision to its February meeting.
Board members said they wanted plans to show the entire building, which also houses a fitness gym and chiropractic office, including exterior signs.
“If it comes to us as a total package, we'd be able to make a better decision,” said Barbara Ciampini, a board member and city planner.
“I'd feel better ... if we had a global perspective of what you're doing,” she added.
Jeff Peterinelli, grand knight of the Knights of Columbus in Greensburg and president of Columbus Home — a property holding company for the Knights — agreed to return with a better drawing.
That rendering will include the sign for the chiropractic office, Peterinelli said.
City officials issued a notice of violation after the chiropractic sign was put up without approval, Ciampini said.
“A building like this, the real interest will come from signage,” said board member Lee Calisti, an architect.
Workers have begun interior work for the proposed Muse Salon, said Tim Zontek of BZ Construction.
Operators hoped to be in the salon this month, but the start-up date will be pushed back now for at least six weeks, Zontek said.
In another matter, the city board approved signs for Golden Treasures and the Massage Therapy and Wellness Center on the East Otterman side of the building at 101 N. Main St.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.