South Greensburg on easy street for getting grant funding
South Greensburg will have an easier time using money from a federal program to pay for street work.
Borough officials learned this month that the entire community is considered low-to-moderate income under the Community Development Block Grant program.
Federal officials determined 48.68 percent of residents meet income guidelines; more than the 47.99 percent cutoff for eligibility, borough officials said.
“The big thing that's happening is the classification of the borough of South Greensburg as low- to moderate- income ... and we don't have to do a survey,” Councilman Tom Yarnell said.
Previously, borough officials needed to survey residents' income in involved work areas to determine whether they met the guidelines.
To be eligible, the assessment needed to show at least 51 percent of residents in the work area fell into the income classification.
The program operates in three-year cycles.
Between 2015 and 2018, the borough expects to receive $73,863. That's up from $57,695 received the last cycle.
Borough officials said they can use the money all at once or spread it out over three years.
During a meeting Monday, council asked its engineer to determine costs for work on three roads, Secretary Lee Kunkle said.
One is Huff Avenue, from the American Legion post to Ashland Street, and from Cedar Street to South Greensburg Community Park.
The other two are Sheridan Avenue, from Ashland to Pine Street, and Jamison Avenue, from Pine to Oak Street.
Council approved changing zoning for 20 Huff Ave. from a one-family residential district to a general commercial district.
Dr. Dennis Kreinbrook bought a home at the property with plans to use it for Kreinbrook Psychological Services, borough officials said.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.