ShareThis Page

Complicated gun laws explained in free seminar in Hempfield

Renatta Signorini
| Thursday, Aug. 20, 2015, 1:44 p.m.

Gun safety and rights will be the topic at a popular free seminar next month in Hempfield.

The session, hosted by State Rep. Tim Krieger, R-Delmont, has drawn a lot of interest in the past.

“People ask about it all the time,” Krieger said. “I think the laws are more complicated than most people know.”

The seminar will feature the expertise and knowledge of Greensburg attorney Ed Bilik and Kim Stolfer, National Rifle Association certified training counselor, chief instructor and chief range safety officer. A question-and-answer session will be held during the two-hour educational seminar.

Bilik said he plans to explain gun regulations at both the state and federal levels and the differences between the two.

“We see a lot of people get in trouble with them,” he said.

Other topics will be related to the lawful purchase and ownership of a firearm and traveling with a gun between states. Bilik said he plans to explain Pennsylvania's open carry laws and how to properly follow them.

“It is certainly an issue which is in the news a lot,” he said. “My role is to explain what can be very, very complicated gun laws.”

Plus, Bilik said he will discuss how a situation involving police can change when a civilian is legally carrying a firearm.

Krieger said seating is limited and pre-registration with his office is recommended.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or rsignorini@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.