Council to approve $5.1 million city budget tonight
City Council is set approve its 2013 budget during a 6 p.m. meeting today.
The draft budget, approved in November, included no layoffs, no tax increase and no cuts to services.
The $5,157,950 draft budget keeps the tax rate set at 32.62 mills. Each mill generates $64,971 for the city.
Council finance chair Bill Bedont said earlier this month that the city will bring in $100,000 more in revenues than expected this year. He also said the city has spent $200,000 more than expected. Bedont said the city will be able to continue paying all of its bills through the end of the year, continue to make payroll and will be able to repay the tax anticipation loan taken out early this year.
The police pension installment, which is $414,000 this year, could be the payment that hurts the city's ability to end the year ‘even.' Bedont said the city will pay as much of that installment as possible. Any amount that isn't paid by the end of this month will begin to accrue interest each month until it is paid off. If the pension installment isn't paid in full this month, it could affect the 2013 budget.
Any changes that would need to be made to the spending plan would likely take place next month, once the exact figures for the end of 2012 are known.
During this month's council meeting, Mayor Robert Carter said the city is still working toward ending the year even and “dollars are still coming in. We will make payroll to the end of the year.”
At that meeting, Carter said the city's three unions had still not signed contracts, but he said the agreements were close to being finalized. He said the unions understood the city's need to implement a wage freeze during 2013.
Kristie Linden is an editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at email@example.com or 724-838-5154.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.