Lady Jays undefeated in section play
Jeannette girls basketball cleaned things up last Thursday in a 55-point drubbing of a young East Allegheny team to move to 4-0 in Class-AA, Section 3 play, and 6-3 overall.
The win stopped a messy two-game losing skid that saw the Jayhawks turn the ball over 56 times — a trend head coach LuAnn Mills was happy to see end.
“My concern is turnovers. We have not been coming to the ball,” said Mills. “We did much better against EA, but we have to keep doing that.”
After jumping out to a 15-point lead and completely dominating the play in the first half, Mills used the second half to play her bench and work on her team's passing and rebounding.
“There isn't enough time to work on those things when games are close,” said Mills. “We had a good chance to work on those things during the game.”
Jeannette has a chance to put some ground between themselves and two of their main challengers for the section, Shady Side Academy (2-2, 4-7) and Greensburg Central Catholic (3-0, 8-2).
The Jayhawks travel to Shady Side tonight and host GCC on Monday night. Jeannette will play a game on Saturday at the Coaches vs. Caner Backyard Brawlz event at Seton Hill University against Greensburg Salem.
Mills is not worried about her team potentially looking ahead on the schedule to the GCC game — not because she doesn't think it will happen, but because she knows it will happen.
“I know they'll look ahead because I look ahead. It is such a big game for all of us,” said Mills. “But we focus on one game at a time.
“I tell the girls that they cannot know what's going to happen with the other teams, so to stay focused on what we have to do.”
Jeannette (4-0) (6-3)
GCC (3-0) (8-2)
Springdale (2-1) (5-6)
Shady Side (2-2) (4-7)
Riverview (1-3) (6-5)
South Allegheny (0-3) (4-6)
East Allegheny (0-3) (1-8)
Dave Moio is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.