Jeannette council discusses parking issues throughout city
Jeannette City Council has been considering solutions to the city's on- and off-street parking problems for several months and in at least one area targeted enforcement has begun.
Parking issues in the city range from vehicles parked on the wrong side of the street facing oncoming traffic to vehicles that are parked on top of sidewalks. Council has also dealt with decisions to bag city parking meters and to make parking in the Magee Avenue lot free.
Mayor Robert Carter and Police Chief Brad Shepler have discussed the wrong-way parking issues and various other parking offenses at council meetings for several months. Beginning last year, Carter started warning residents who were used to parking on the street facing the wrong direction that police were about to start ticketing those violations.
Soon after the tickets began landing on cars throughout the city, Carter and Shepler said they received complaints from residents. To be clear, Shepler said, though the targeted enforcement may be new, the parking laws refer to the state vehicle code and parking against traffic is illegal throughout the state.
Shepler said some people who have received tickets have not paid them in a timely manner and warns residents that unpaid tickets will be referred to District Judge Joseph DeMarchis and then the price goes up.
“The fine on wrong-way parking (against traffic) is up to $15 in the vehicle code. If a city ticket is paid, it stays at $15. If it is not paid and a citation is filed at the magistrate, in addition to a fine of up to $15, there are court costs of $37,” Shepler said.
Carter said the targeted enforcement is in response to several accidents caused by both drivers trying to pull across a street to park against traffic and by drivers pulling out of a parking spot and crossing traffic. Carter said in addition to the three or four accidents that were reported, he's been told of several near misses and he is concerned that someone is going to get hurt in such an accident.
Shepler said all vehicle code parking violations are being targeted.
Councilman Mark Levander brought Signature Control, a parking meter company, to a council meeting to demonstrate a computerized machine that could be operated at the Magee Avenue parking lot as a way of returning some of the parking revenue back to the city coffers.
The lot was made free last year after the lot attendants were laid off. Shortly thereafter, council also made the decision to bag all city parking meters, lay off the meter attendants and to make parking free city-wide.
The decisions have been met with some praise from business owners who appreciate the free parking for their customers and some negative comments from residents who want the cash-strapped city to begin bringing in the parking revenue once again.
Gino Ori and Doug Lape of Signature Control, the parking company, told council members there are a variety of computerized devices to choose from — including a gate device with a mechanical arm that would block drivers from exiting the parking lot without first paying the parking rate to devices that could be used on city streets as parking meters that would print tickets drivers would place on their windshields.
Ori said the machines are virtually vandalism-proof and can be updated over time to include more options for payment. Street parking meters cost in the range of $14,000, but Ori and Lape said the company could split revenues with the city to pay the machines off rather than requiring up-front payment.
Ori said if over a certain amount of time the city hadn't earned enough parking revenue to pay off the machine, the company could buy the equipment back from the city.
“We've always made money over the years (from parking meters), we need to get back to that,” Councilman Mark Clark said.
Levander said he is not opposed to looking at bringing back the paid street meters, but wants to make sure it's worth the city's while to do so.
Kristie Linden is an editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-838-5154.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.