'Amazing Bugs' sparks McKee Elementary students' imagination
In the midst of Pennsylvania System of School Assessment testing, Jeannette McKee Elementary School students got a chance to take a peek into the world of insects.
Jon Doctorick of the Carnegie Science Center brought “Amazing Bugs” to the elementary gymnasium. Students who attend the district's after school program sponsored by the Private Industry Council were invited to attend the program and bring two guests.
The middle school JAYS after school program students were also invited.
As Doctorick asked questions to gauge the students' knowledge about bugs, children raised their hands to offer answers and to volunteer to participate in various demonstrations. The children laughed and applauded as they learned about the anatomy of certain bugs and the “super powers” they have. Students got a chance to demonstrate some of those super powers — some children were able to strap on moon boots to display the super power of jumping as high as possible and another student was able to prove his super strength.
Students learned about insects that mimic their surroundings in order to blend in and had a chance to try to find some bugs camouflaged in large posters.
“Since the SES/PIC after school program has been focused on getting students ready for these (PSSA) assessments, this assembly is like a fun reward for them during assessment week,” said Chandra Orbin, McKee teacher and coordinator for the after school and summer programs sponsored by the Private Industry Council.
Kristie Linden is an editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-838-5154.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.