Jeannette School Board to meet to discuss 2013-14 budget
The Jeannette School Board will meet today at 5 p.m. in the administration building to discuss the 2013-14 budget.
Last month, the board approved a preliminary budget that no increase in taxes. In order to achieve that, Superintendent Matthew Hutcheson said the board would need to trim about $47,500 more from the budget, which initially called for a 1-mill tax hike.
The board voted against the idea of a tax increase at the May meeting and even those who voted in favor of it's passage — Moe Lewis and Dr. David Valerio — said they were only voting for the increase as a temporary measure and had the intention of eliminating that increase before the budget's final adoption later this month.
Tonight's meeting will cover the cuts that have been made to refine the spending plan. If the board approves the budget with no tax increase at it's meeting at 8 p.m. on June 24, the millage will remain at 82.72 mills.
The biggest concern for the board this year, and most years, is that the state budget won't lower the amount of funding it plans to send to Jeannette. Each year the board must build its budget based on preliminary estimates the state offers before the final state budget is passed.
This year, the board was told to expect nearly $90,000 more in state funding than it received last year. If that figure decreases, funding the budget without use of a tax increase or spending reserve funds will be difficult.
Kristie Linden is an editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-838-5154.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.