Former Jeannette city treasurer remains on ballot
By Nicole Chynoweth
Published: Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, 2:12 p.m.
Former Jeannette city treasurer Sam Casino, who resigned from his post in July, still intends to run in November's election, he said Friday.
When asked what he plans to do if he is elected, Casino declined to comment.
“I cannot answer that right now,” he said.
When he resigned from his post in July, Casino cited no official reason. He did not wish to discuss it Friday.
Casino said he does not plan on campaigning.
“I've been a visible treasurer,” he said. “People have known me since 2002.”
Council appointed Michael Nestico in July to finish Casino's term. Nestico is the Republican candidate for the position, as he ran a successful write-in campaign in the primary.
Nestico said Monday that Casino's intent to run does not affect his campaign moving forward.
“I had planned on running a campaign regardless, so this isn't going to modify anything,” Nestico said.
According to Jim Montini of the county election bureau, Casino would have had to resign from the ballot by Aug. 12 if he did not wish to continue in the election.
Montini said if Casino is elected and does not wish to take office, it will be strictly up to the municipality and Casino to address the issue.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Historic stone house demolished next to Monsour Hospital
- Jeannettee_SSRqs conversations generate ideas for community