PennDOT rejects Jeannette's request to fix hillside
PennDOT has rejected the City of Jeannette's request to grade a hillside along Route 30.
City solicitor Scott Avolio said PennDOT's current road-widening project, just east of Jeannette, involved grading hillsides along the road. He said several residents voiced concerns about the cliff-like appearance of a hillside near Bel Aire Place that was not graded, so council reached out to PennDOT, asking it to make the hillside look similar to the neighboring graded properties.
PennDOT responded stating that the hillside is not in its right of way and the work is outside of the original scope of the project, so it cannot agree to fund the work.
“They don't own the whole hillside,” Avolio said. “It's not something they budgeted for.”
City engineer Ed Antonacci said he recently had a meeting with several representatives from Westmoreland County to discuss other ways of taking care of the matter.
“We're going to try to see if there are any other options available to get that taken care of so that it can be balanced with the other side of the road and make the appearance more unified,” he said.
Antonacci also said he and resident Tony DeNunzio recently met with Tay Waltenbaugh, director of Westmoreland Community Action, to discuss options.
Waltenbaugh said he is unsure how he can assist at this time and is looking into it. He said it would help if the Neighborhood Partnership Program gained more partners, so that it could generate more funding to address projects like the hillside. He said if he does figure out a way to help, he will first need approval from his advisory committee to proceed.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.