Jacobelli selected Jeannette mayor in landslide
Richard Jacobelli is the new mayor of Jeannette by a landslide, according to unofficial election results.
Jacobelli, 66, carried all eight precincts, besting incumbent Robert Carter, who lost the Democratic primary nomination to Jacobelli and later mounted a write-in campaign.
Jacobelli received nearly 74 percent of the vote.
“I consider this a mandate,” Jacobelli said. “The residents of the city want change, and we're going to give it to them. I can't wait till January.”
Jacobelli graduated from Jeannette High School and spent most of his adult life working as an airline mechanic in California. He moved back to Jeannette after retirement.
The new mayor inherits a city rife with financial problems caused in part by the cost of providing services, including a police force of a dozen officers to protect a population of 9,200.
Since he took office four years ago after serving as a councilman, Carter, 54, has tried to pull the city out of its financial quagmire. But neither he nor city council was willing to make changes until it was on the brink of being classified a distressed city subject to state oversight.
Carter did not support state recommendations to reduce the size of the police force, abolish the paid fire department, hire a private contractor to collect garbage and improve bookkeeping operations.
Jeannette could end the year with another budget deficit. Officials said they have not fully paid their mandatory contribution to the police pension fund for 2012 and will not be able to pay this year's.
The city must repay a $350,000 tax anticipation loan by the end of the year so it can borrow another $350,000 next year.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.