Jeannette City Council expected to approve 2014 budget
Jeannette City Council planned to approve a $5.9 million draft budget Monday night that increases the Earned Income Tax (EIT) and calls for an increase in commercial garbage rates.
The meeting ended too late for this week's edition. Bill Bedont, city finance chairman, said no changes were made to the budget since the draft spending plan was approved last month.
The EIT will increase by .35 percent, to a total of 1.5 percent collected each year from city residents.
The city will collect 1 percent, and .5 percent goes to the school district. Of the city's portion, .5 percent will be allocated strictly for paying down Jeannette's pension debt.
The police pension payment for 2013, which is about $536,000, was not paid by the end of the year and will roll over into this year and begin to accrue interest. As a result, the full pension obligation in 2014 will be $1.36 million, which forced the city to increase revenues to build a balanced budget.
In addition to the increased EIT, the city approved an increase in commercial garbage rates.
Bedont said he expects the increases to bring in about $140,000 more annually.
Additionally, once the pension payments are caught up that total obligation will begin to decrease each year and Bedont has said that is the key to righting the city's financial ship.
Kristie Linden is an editor for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at email@example.com or 724-838-5154.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.