St. Vincent College pasta engineering contest planned
Area high school students will find out who has built the strongest miniature bridge out of uncooked pasta on Monday at the Pasta Engineering Contest in the Fred M. Rogers Center at St. Vincent College in Unity.
The competition is designed to increase awareness about the role engineering plays in our lives and the career opportunities in the field, and to provide students with an opportunity to collaborate on design and construction.
During the competition, weights are added to the pasta bridges until they collapse. The bridge that sustains the largest amount of weight before collapsing is the winner.
Forty teams from nine Westmoreland County high schools are expected to participate in this year's contest, including Greensburg Central Catholic, Greensburg Salem, Hempfield Area, Jeannette, Greater Latrobe, Norwin, Penn Trafford and Yough.
Participants were given two pounds of spaghetti noodles, 10 lasagna noodles and a hot glue gun, which they use to build model bridges designed in their classrooms during a two-month period.
Students will have to carefully transport their constructions to the college one hour before the competition begins at 6 p.m. The event is open to the public.
Judges for the competition will be Matt Burns of Gibson-Thomas Engineering of Latrobe, Laura Volle of Michael Baker Corp. of Moon and Stephen Jodis and Paul Follansbee, both of St. Vincent College.
The engineering competition is sponsored by Carbone's Restaurant of Crabtree and the Herbert W. Boyer School of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Computing at St. Vincent.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.