More charges filed against Latrobe man in alleged sex assaults
More sexual assault charges were filed on Monday against a 23-year-old Latrobe man who is accused of assaulting two young girls in his residence in Latrobe, as well as in Southwest Greensburg and Derry.
Latrobe police allege that Frank R. Baker III of Washington Street assaulted the 6- and 3-year-old girls multiple times between April 2011 and January 2013, according to the criminal complaint filed before Unity District Judge Michael Mahady.
Baker's alleged confession in the Westmoreland County jail on Feb. 14 led to the charges, Latrobe police Officer Michelle Preston said.
Preston charged Baker with three counts of rape of a child, aggravated indecent assault, indecent exposure and endangering the welfare of children, and six counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault and corruption of minors.
Baker initially was charged on Feb. 4 with sexually assaulting one girl. Police began the investigation last month after the child's mother was told of the alleged assault, according to court records.
Baker, who was arraigned before Mahady on the new charges, waived his right to a preliminary hearing. He was returned to county jail in lieu of $50,000 bond.
Although some of the assaults allegedly occurred in a residence in Southwest Greensburg, Preston said, borough police decided to have one police department file the new charges. Other assaults allegedly occurred in an East Second Street residence in Derry, police said.
If convicted, Baker could face a lengthy prison sentence. During the arraignment, Mahady said each count of rape of a child carries a possible 20-year prison sentence.
Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush said there is not a tentative plea bargain in the case.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.