ShareThis Page

Unity willing to talk parks with Latrobe rec agency

Joe Napsha
| Tuesday, March 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

As differences mount between Unity officials and the regional recreation commission the community shares with Latrobe, a Unity official said last week that he is willing to meet with the organization to discuss the issues.

The tension between the township supervisors and the recreation commission was apparent again recently when Michael O'Barto, chairman of the Unity board of supervisors, refused to give the Latrobe-Unity Parks & Recreation Commission written confirmation that Unity does not want a $42,000 grant for improvements to Central Park in the village of Marguerite.

Jeanne Ashley, executive director of the parks and recreation commission, told commission members on March 21 that she repeatedly had asked O'Barto for written confirmation that the township was turning down a $42,000 state grant to install a tot lot in a Marguerite play area.

When contacted after the meeting, O'Barto said that was “old news” and he did not want to discuss the matter in the newspaper.

O'Barto said he would be willing to meet with recreation commission members and the staff to discuss recreation matters, but he added, “We just don't trust anyone.”

“We just feel bruised and battered,” he said, adding that there have been “miscommunications” with the recreation commission on a number of matters.

The supervisors last year notified the commission that they did not intend to renew Unity's participation in the regional recreational commission with Latrobe when its agreement expires at the end of 2014. The separation came after years of disagreement over recreation commission operations.

In a recent dispute, Ashley said there apparently was miscommunication between the supervisors and members of the Central-Unity Township Community Association, which oversees development in the park. Some association members wanted a tot lot, while others wanted a walking track in the park.

The recreation commission decided to use the $42,000 matching grant toward improvements in Cardinal Park in Latrobe. The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources agreed to redirect the grant to the Latrobe park, Ashley said. The grant required a $6,000 match.

“Right now, they're (township supervisors) not in the mood to talk to anyone,” said Joseph Mozina, a Unity Township representative.

Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or jnapsha@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.