Unity zoning board OKs variance for car dealership sign
The Unity Township Zoning Hearing Board has approved a sign touting the expansion of a car dealership.
Pittsburgh Sign and Lighting LLC applied for a variance on behalf of Smail Auto Group for a single-pole lighted sign that will be outside a building at 5019 Route 30 West, site of the former Italian Oven.
The square sign will be 22 feet high and read “Smail Pre-Owned Center II” on each side, measuring 134 square feet total, 44 square feet more than allowed in the B-2 zoning classification.
Zoning officer Joann Dunn reported to the board that the township had no opposition to the sign, which will sit outside the state right of way to the highway.
Mark Wood of Pittsburgh Sign and Lighting said a sign within the zoning parameters would not be visible enough to passing drivers on Route 30.
“There's a lot of white area on there,” he said. “It's impossible the way their logo is to fill that area and still be visible, especially with the setback on the road.”
Leonard Peffer, facilities maintenance manager with Smail Auto Group, wrote on the application that the hardship for the variance was “speed of traffic,” which is not an acceptable hardship, according to the board.
Wood said, however, that it would be difficult to see the sign from the west at only 30 square feet per side.
Board approval of the variance was unanimous.
Before the sign is installed, the company must submit an application permit that requires zoning board approval, Dunn said.
Stacey Federoff is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.