ShareThis Page

School officials pitch in to help Derry student achieve goal

| Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013, 8:15 p.m.
Lindsay Dill | For the Tribune-Review
Derry Area High School agriculture instructor Roy Campbell, senior student Nathan Pollard, and superintendent David Welling stand in a barn behind the high school where Pollard readied a pig for the county fair. Welling and Campbell provided financial assistance to Pollard to raise a pig to sell at the county fair.

Derry Area High School senior Nathan Pollard expressed interest in raising a market hog for the Westmoreland Fair last school year, but needed help funding the up-front costs associated with his project.

Fortunately for Pollard, his school district and its superintendent share a strong commitment to agricultural education.

Superintendent David Welling talked with agriculture and horticulture instructor and FFA adviser Roy Campbell and offered Pollard a solution: Welling would sponsor the project and Pollard would be able to house the pig in a pen in the FFA barn on the school campus.

“I had been wanting to do it for a while and I just never got to,” Pollard said. “Then Dr. Welling, it was after school and he came up with the opportunity for me to do it. About a week later, we went and got the hog.”

If the hog, which they nicknamed “Champ” qualified for the fair's market sale, Pollard would repay the hog's purchase price of $100 and feed costs, donate 25 percent of the remaining profit to the school's FFA program and keep the rest. If Champ didn't make the minimum weight required for the market sale, Welling would pay Pollard for the time he spent on the project and keep the pig.

“I think Nathan realized it would be better if he could get it to go to sale than not, because he was going to make more money if it went to sale ...” Welling said. “We did the numbers and I think he realized even paying back me, paying back Mr. Campbell and donating to the FFA, he still comes out ahead.”

The arrangement worked out for all parties involved. Champ just reached the 230-pound minimum weight to qualify for the fair and sold for $1.90 per pound, enough for Pollard to turn a profit on the project.

Pollard said he learned a lot from completing his first market livestock project.

“I didn't know how to walk a pig or anything, really, about them,” Pollard said. “Mr. Campbell helped me out a lot, and then a couple of my friends that had shown hogs previously helped me learn how to walk them and stuff. Dr. Welling and I taught him to sit, too, so that was pretty cool.”

“I learned a lot,” Pollard said. “Everything from clipping the pig to walking it, feeding it, how to feed it, how much, keeping records. ... And it gives you something to be responsible for, too.”

Now, Pollard is working on plans to purchase a pig to compete at the Pennsylvania Farm Show in January, and the money originally earmarked to reimburse Welling for Champ will help fund part of Pollard's new project.

“I said, ‘Rather than paying me back, I'll donate that money towards your other pig and going down to states,' because I think that's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for these kids,” Welling said.

“It's more than just feeding an animal and taking it to the fair,” he added. “It's really an opportunity for them to really learn some skills that are going to transfer across their lives, no matter what they get involved in.”

Greg Reinbold is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-459-6100, ext. 2913, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.