ShareThis Page

Latrobe grad's documentary explores intimate partner violence

| Tuesday, June 23, 2015, 8:13 p.m.
Tracy Schott, a graduate of Greater Latrobe High School and Penn State University, spent 15 years as a social worker before deciding to pursue a career in telecommunications.
Tracy Schott, a graduate of Greater Latrobe High School and Penn State University, spent 15 years as a social worker before deciding to pursue a career in telecommunications.

After years of working with families as a social worker, a Latrobe native is using filmmaking to raise awareness about intimate partner violence.

Tracy Schott, 56, a graduate of Greater Latrobe High School and Penn State University, spent 15 years as a social worker before deciding it was time for a change.

“The other side of my brain needed work; I was always a writer,” she said. “To me, it's always about finding, telling and engaging in the story. I'm interested in motivating peoples' hearts.”

Schott, who lives in Reading, is set to release her first documentary, “Finding Jenn's Voice,” on Saturday at the Pittsburgh Independent Film Festival.

The film is the story of Jennifer Snyder, 27, of Allentown, who was murdered in 2011 by her boyfriend on learning she was pregnant.

The concept for the film originated with Snyder's aunt, Trina Angelovich-Rothrock, who requested that Schott make a documentary on the issue. Schott at first had doubts about the idea.

“My first thought was: ‘Oh, a documentary? That is going to be hard to sell,' ” she said. “But then I did some research.”

Homicide is the leading cause of death of women during pregnancy, according to a study by Dr. Isabelle Horon of the Maryland Department of Health. The study, published in 2001 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, was one of many sources Schott used during filming.

She also interviewed some of the top experts on the subject in the country, including researchers from Johns Hopkins and Rutgers universities.

Through fundraisers and donations, she raised about $85,000 to make the film, but fell drastically short of its $300,000 budget. Schott said she and her staff worked without pay for more than two years.

“I think Tracy and her staff did an outstanding job. Not only did they put in their time and money, they put in their hearts,” Angelovich-Rothrock said. “They lived it, they breathed it, they truly embraced the film. I feel very blessed that they would do this for Jenn.”

Angelovich-Rothrock said that although the film was very difficult for both her as well as all of Snyder's family, she hopes it will help others recognize the signs of abuse and get help before it's too late.

Schott interviewed 11 women throughout the course of the film, all of whom had experienced intimate partner violence in some capacity.

Using the skills acquired in her earlier occupation, she believes the film can make a difference.

“I felt like I was a social worker again,” she said. “These 11 women have gone from victims to survivors to advocates.”

With the completion of such a grueling project, Schott said, she would like to do something different for her next film.

“The next project is going to be something fun,” she said. “This project has been very emotional for everyone.”

Matt Faye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.