Police track alleged Cook Township thieves through precious metal records
Two Cook Township residents accused of stealing silver and gold from a local woman were charged by state police last week.
Police allege Crystal Rae Rackowski, 21, and Dylan Andrew McClintic, 24, allegedly took the items from the home of a relative of McClintic's and sold them at the The Treasure Hunt in Unity Township, state police at Greensburg said.
Police began an investigation after seeing several transactions between July 1 and Aug. 14 on precious metals records, according to the affidavit of probable cause.
Sold items included Tiffany & Co. flatware, sterling silver teapots, silver cups, bowls and ladles, a 14-karat gold picture frame and a sterling silver bowl from Rolling Rock Club with the victim's late husband's name inscribed on it, according to court records.
The couple received more than $4,000 for the items.
“Due to the fact that (the two suspects) were relatively young, it seemed unlikely that they would have such a collection of flatware and silver dishes,” police said in the affidavit.
Police interviewed the victim, who said McClintic had access to her home, but she and Rackowski had not authority to sell the items.
They were charged with theft and receiving stolen property on Sept. 19. They were arraigned before District Judge Denise Snyder Thiel and each was released on $10,000 unsecured bond.
McClintic's and Rackowski's preliminary hearings are scheduled for 10:45 and 11 a.m. Friday, respectively.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.