ShareThis Page

Authority approves $8.8 million budget

| Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012, 8:17 a.m.

There will be no rate increases for customers of Ligonier Township Municipal Authority after officials balanced its budget through March 2013.

There was some question about rate increases earlier this year, when the first budget draft presented by water engineer Ben Faas showed a $166,000 deficit. Both sewage and water customers have been spared.

At the time, authority member Bill Stablein said the deficit was due to unequal splits between the authority's water and sewage departments and that the books needed to be reviewed.

When the new fiscal year started in April, President Glen Kalp said the authority would operate “month to month” this year.

That changed when the state Rural Utility Service said the authority needed to front $3.1 million for the Darlington sewer system project.

“The bank that we're using for the ($3.1 million) line of credit for Darlington required us to have a budget,” Kalp said.

The $8.8 million budget, approved unanimously Oct. 3, differs only slightly from last year's operating expenses.

But sewage income increased by $200,000 with new customers coming on with the completion of the Ligonier East sewage system expansion project. Coupled with that increase in income is an additional $160,000 budgeted for treatment expenses.

More sewage customers will be added after the Darlington project is completed next year.

Sewage engineer Mark Gera of Gibson-Thomas Engineering said the project is on schedule.

Gera said he hopes to obtain approval to start a project to expand the sewer system into Laughlintown by next month.

Faas said plans for the water expansion project in Fairfield Township has been put on hold until authority solicitor Don Snyder and the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County come to an agreement on the Ligonier authority's purchase of the Westmoreland authority's water.

Jewels Phraner is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.