Authority takes legal action on property owners
Ligonier Township Municipal Authority officials have filed summary offenses against more than a dozen residents who haven't connected to the authority's sewage line along state Route 30.
The township passed a law more than a year ago that requires owners of property within 150 feet of the line to “tap-in” at a cost of $1,500 plus the expense of installing a private line that connects any structures to the authority's line.
Those who haven't complied could face a fine of $1,000 a day, which for some started in July 2011.
Authority solicitor Don Snyder said in projects like the authority's there's always a certain number of people who refuse to connect.
“For the size of this project, I would say this is a normal amount of people,” he said. “But if they don't tap in, they're going to have to pay the fee and pay for the service anyway, so they're not saving any money by waiting.”
Ligonier Township began installing sewer lines in a multi-phase, $22 million project after a mandate from the state's Department of Environmental Protection.
The project is mostly funded through PennVEST, a state-governed, low-interest loan service. Money collected from the tap-in fees is required to go toward repayment of that loan.
“All the authority is looking for is simply compliance,” Snyder said. “We're in the business of keeping the pollution out of the waters of the Commonwealth, as required by the state. That's the reason we did this project in the first place.”
Residents who received a notice of the summary offense will have to plead guilty or not guilty. Those who plead not guilty will be required to attend a hearing before Ligonier District Judge Denise Snyder Thiel.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.