Bolivar mayor will not resign
By Jewels Phraner
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 9:58 a.m.
Bolivar Mayor Everett Saxton will not resign, he said at a special meeting last week.
In the wake of Bolivar Borough council members asking him to step down from his post, Saxton said he plans to finish his term, which ends next year, and possibly seek re-election.
Officials approved the $58,600 budget, which calls for no tax increase.
Officials voted to dissolve the force, at a savings of $21,750, and pass on a $1,350 cost for fire hydrants to residents.
Residents will pay between $1.25 and $1.50 bimonthly to Highridge Water Authority for the hydrants.
Council voted earlier this month to ask for Saxton's resignation because he wasn't properly monitoring police officers.
Councilwoman Sue Bartow told him again last week that officers were often times working whenever they felt like it.
Months ago, council members asked Saxton to limit police work to 16 hours a week but Bartow said she saw time cards turned in for nearly 25 hours.
“They're too free to come and go as they (darn) well please,” she said. “They're taking advantage of us. They're walking all over you.”
Bartow complained about officers assisting other municipalities while being paid by the borough.
Officers do not “need to be in Seward or New Florence or West Bolivar for three, four hours at a time,” Bartow said.
“We have to come up with a better policy, if we ever do this again,” said Councilman Tom Pickup.
The borough cut funding for the police force for 2013.
After the meeting, Saxton said he felt that the officers always did a good job.
Council will next meet at 6:30 p.m. Jan. 7.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.