Seward Borough allocates Act 13 monies to police fund
Seward Borough Council members approved a motion to place the Marcellus Shale Act 13 monies received by the borough in 2012, totaling $1,632.79, into the police fund, after a discussion on the subject at last week's meeting.
Solicitor Scott Mears reminded council members that Act 13 monies can be used for emergency preparedness such as police and fire. An Unconventional Gas Well Fund Usage form will be filed by April 15, 2013, with the Public Utility Commission in Harrisburg indicating the specific usage determined by the borough for the Act 13 fees they received in 2012.
There is an opening for one person from Seward to begin a term on the Seward/St. Clair Township Sewage Authority. The authority already has two individuals from Seward Borough and two individuals from St. Clair Township. Seward resident Mike Hamilton's term has expired as an alternate in the fifth seat on the authority. President Brian Custer suggested posting the vacancy throughout the Seward area to solicit interested individuals for the seat's term on the authority.
In other business:
• Councilman Jason Piwowar made cost-saving repairs to the borough's salt/gravel spreader when it broke down during the recent snowstorm. Councilman Dave Croyle said the borough has 20 tons of gravel with salt mixed in ready for the next snowfall.
• The police force worked 277 ¾ duty hours in December. There were 29 traffic citations, two non-traffic citations and five incidents which included a vehicle hit-and-run.
• A new computer and updated version of Quick Books for the borough's office was recently purchased by Custer for a discounted total price of $449.
The next meeting is 7 p.m. Feb. 12 at the borough building on Indiana Street in Seward.
Alice White is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.