Ligonier Valley High School welcome Rams mascot
By Peter Turcik
Published: Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
At a recent boys basketball game, the Ligonier Valley High School cheerleading squad introduced the school's new Rams mascot. This is the first time Ligonier Valley has had a mascot since merging with Laurel Valley Middle/High School in 2010.
Cheerleader Emma Markle, a junior, said the squad purchased the mascot suit this year with funds received from the student council as well as from the squad's own budget. Juniors Caitlin Michaels and April Goodman entered tryouts to wear the suit and will contribute to pumping up crowds and promoting school pride.
“I'm so stoked. It's always been my secret dream,” Michaels said. “When I was in middle school, I wanted to be the Mounties mascot. Then we became the Rams, and I wouldn't be able to do it. I thought maybe my senior year we could purchase a Rams mascot.”
Michaels' wish came a year early, when she learned about the new Rams suit. Michaels earned the position by performing “Gangnam Style,” a song and dance by South Korean artist Psy.
“I told Caitlin we had already purchased the mascot, and we were having tryouts in a couple of weeks,” Markle said. “She was really good.”
Both Markle and Michaels think the inclusion of the mascot has been a popular move with the students. Michaels said she has received a great deal of publicity since being named mascot. She also said that it has brought together the students from both schools, creating a kind of unity behind the Rams image.
“I think a lot of people like it. I think it's a new twist,” Michaels said. “We haven't had a mascot for a few years because we consolidated. I think it shows support and how we have all bonded to become the Rams. We take pride in our school and who we are.”
Peter Turcik is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.