St. Clair, Seward residents want regional police
A group of residents from Seward Borough and St. Clair Township hopes officials and residents will favorably receive a plan to regionalize the area's police departments.
The group came to the St. Clair Township supervisors' meeting last week to ask for volunteers to add to a committee of those looking into the plan.
The group plans to go before New Florence and Bolivar borough councils and Fairfield Township supervisors, as well.
Seward resident Bob Bouch said once the group can determine which municipalities are interested and work through the logistics of a regional force — such as who will run the department and how it will be funded — they will seek putting a referendum on the ballot for voters to decide on the issue.
“I think putting it on the ballot is a great idea,” Supervisor Jim Caldwell said. “That way we can really see what the people want.”
It will not appear on this year's ballot.
“This is going to be, like, a year process,” said Dennis Rudnik, who volunteered to represent St. Clair Township on the committee, along with Supervisor Fred Clark and resident Wayne Waugh.
Seward's representatives, appointed at the borough council meeting earlier, are Councilman Shawn Shaftic and residents Bouch and Sandy Mitchell.
This isn't the first time a regional police force has been proposed for this area.
At the St. Clair Township meeting, supervisors and audience members from both St. Clair and Seward argued about which municipality backed out each time it's been pursued.
“It's neither here nor there, but just to set the record straight, St. Clair dropped out,” Seward resident Tom Custer said.
“We only backed out because the Seward mayor told us they weren't interested in pursuing it with us,” Supervisor Richard Hill said.
Bouch said he's hoping the citizens advisory committee will eliminate that kind of talk.
“We don't want any bad blood, we just want a regionalized police force,” he said.
St. Clair supervisors also addressed a letter signed by a dozen residents on Fifth Street complaining about the state of their road.
Fifth Street landlord Carol Cushman represented the group at the meeting.
“The road has deteriorated and has become almost impossible for commuting, walking, and children and adults who bicycle,” Cushman said. “At least four years ago, Evelyn Blankebicker, now deceased, complained that she could not cross the street with her wheelchair or walker to reach her mailbox because of the condition of the road.”
Caldwell said last year, the county earmarked about $140,000 in Community Development Block Grant funding to fix Fifth and Seventh streets, Furnace Lane and a portion of Northview Heights, but the township is still waiting on the engineering specifications for the project.
“They promised me the money last year, but it was getting late in the summer and the engineers asked if we could wait until this summer,” Caldwell said. “We know about the problem and we're trying to address it.”
In other news:
• Secretary Kristina Clark read a letter from township auditors recommending working supervisors receive a 50-cent hourly raise.
• Clark announced that residents wanting to tap into a People Gas line must fill out an application, available at the township building, so the company can determine if enough people are interested in the project
• Police Chief Mike Fusco is seeking applications for an additional borough police officer. Resumes should be sent to the township building, P.O. Box 506, Seward, PA 15954
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.