ShareThis Page

Expanded drop-off lane at Ligonier Valley YMCA to relieve congestion

| Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

In addition to approving the expansion of a drop-off lane in front of the Ligonier Valley YMCA on Church Street, Ligonier officials said they want to crack down on those who park illegally along that street.

Ligonier Borough council members called the congestion that occurs twice daily in front of the Y “chaos.”

Some members were initially hesitant to approve the $18,000 project to extend the lane, which ultimately was approved unanimously.

“Personally, I think you get what you have under control before you get more,” Councilwoman Kim Shaffer said.

Councilman Bob Bell said he witnessed major congestion along Church Street on Thursday as buses tried to navigate through cars illegally parked in the drop-off lane and on the street.

He told Y staff attending the council meeting later that day: “Nothing could go up or down that street. I would like you people to get out and police that on your own, instead of relying on our police department to do it for you.”

Wright said lengthening the drop-off lane offers the best solution.

“We were asked to address the challenge of congestion. That's what we're trying to do here,” Wright said.

Councilman Tom Freeman said the extension of the lane would help to alleviate the congestion.

The Y “should be commended for bringing so many members and so many people into Ligonier,” he said. “It's a good project.” Wright said construction will start as soon as possible.

Council members also approved the resignation of Land Use Administrator Chick Cicconi. Merle Musick will take over those duties on July 4.

Cicconi has served the borough in various capacities, including two stints as land-use administrator and as a council member, mayor and zoning hearing board chairman.

Musick was appointed previously as the borough's building inspector.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.