Township Municipal Authority considers alternative funding
The Ligonier Township Municipal Authority decided to continue investigating alternative funding options for the Darlington and Redrock portion of the sewer system expansion project.
Engineer Jake Bolby said a foundation showed interest in funding a “smaller scope” project like that particular portion. Construction will cost approximately $500,000, according to Bolby.
The board asked Bolby to find out exactly what the foundation would offer and determine the cost for each household to tap into the system.
A meeting with the state for funding is pending.
Authority members also approved several requisitions, including the demolition of the fruit stand on Route 30, which will cost $4,250, and for a gate at the sewage treatment plant to keep out trespassers in the amount of $1,847.37. They approved a requisition for a construction and restoration project in Ligonier East and Laughlintown to cost $97,813.64.
The board approved an extension on Laughlintown resident Rosalie Keslar's tap-in fee. Keslar received a notice of the fee last week, instructing her to pay it in 60 days. Due to her fixed income, she is unable to pay it within that time frame. Authority members said she will have until Oct. 31.
Additionally, authority members ratified the extinguishment of the right-of-way for Travis and Amy Payne.
Ligonier Township Water Department Manager Paul Knupp reported repairs for two water line leaks.
On June 12, a leak in Oakwood Hills occurred in the early-morning hours and was fixed. On June 21, a leak at Nancy Yonkers' residence was fixed.
Knupp said he plans to look into an alarm system for the water system so that the authority is more efficiently notified of issues in the future.
The next meeting will be held Aug. 7.
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.